Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Bridging the Gender Gap: Inspiring Words from the Women Making Waves on Starship | Annie Handrick | | Starship Technologies | March 2023

    March 8, 2023

    AI apps like ChatGPT may finally kill the cover letter

    March 8, 2023

    Snow Crash author Neal Stephenson on the metaverse, making movies, climate fears

    March 6, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Please Visit My Website
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
    • Home
    • Bollywood

      Bollywood Films Shot on iPhone Prove Your Camera Isn’t Holding You Back

      February 2, 2023

      10 Must-See Bollywood Movies

      February 2, 2023

      Rajshri Deshpande reveals Shah Rukh Khan helped her during the Covid pandemic.bollywood

      February 2, 2023

      Rajshri Deshpande reveals Shah Rukh Khan helped her during the Covid pandemic.bollywood

      February 2, 2023

      Anil 40 Years in Bollywood: One thing that hasn’t changed is the virtue of hard work

      February 2, 2023
    • Celebrity

      Kylie Jenner shares first public photos of Son Ia on 1st birthday: ‘You Complete Us’

      February 2, 2023

      Chicken coops at home, celebrities with pet chickens: photos

      February 2, 2023

      Emily Estefan shows off her musical skills in Instagram comeback

      February 2, 2023

      Alexa Chung wears ‘naked’ dress to visit Buckingham Palace

      February 2, 2023

      DNA Journey Returns with Hugh Bonneville, Adrian Dunbar, Oti & Motsi Mabuse

      February 2, 2023
    • Entertainment

      Things to do in Baltimore February 3rd to February 9th – Baltimore Sun

      February 2, 2023

      Stephen Curtis Chapman signs with One Eight

      February 2, 2023

      Legacy, and upcoming DC movies hit theaters

      February 2, 2023

      A new 100th anniversary facility that combines sports and social life

      February 2, 2023

      PENN Entertainment Posts 0.8% Top-Line Growth in December’s Weather-Battered Fourth Quarter – PENN Entertainment (NASDAQ:PENN)

      February 2, 2023
    • Fashion

      The latest trend on TikTok? Tights into pants

      February 2, 2023

      Best Fashion & Beauty News for February 2023 – New Launches & Collaborations

      February 2, 2023

      19 Brilliant Photos of ’70s Retro Style Masters ABBA

      February 2, 2023

      4 Cowgirl Fashion Tips for Styling a Western Skirt

      February 2, 2023

      Intellectual property bias in fashion

      February 2, 2023
    • Gossip

      Letter to the Editor: When Gossip Begins and Destroys Lives | Letter to the Editor

      February 2, 2023

      Claire Crawley: I’m a Married Woman! at last!

      February 2, 2023

      ‘Regular Gossip’ Joins Air Fest Lineup – The Hollywood Reporter

      February 2, 2023

      Ashley Martson robbed during hair salon break-in!

      February 2, 2023

      Meri Brown reunites with Janelle’s sons amid abuse allegations

      February 2, 2023
    • Movies

      10 movies that make you feel sorry for the villains

      February 2, 2023

      The world needs movies like ’80 For Brady’

      February 2, 2023

      True Lies Trailer Reveals Tom Arnold and New Release Date

      February 2, 2023

      These two adventures should be played in preparation for the D&D movie

      February 2, 2023

      17 Black History Month movies to watch with your kids

      February 2, 2023
    • Music

      The Recorder – Community Driven Music Venue Under New Ownership in Greenfield

      February 2, 2023

      Camila Cabello has toned legs in lace nightgown in music video

      February 2, 2023

      Fourth Floor Gents Bring Music to Schools – The Sagamore

      February 2, 2023

      Latino musicians power ‘souldies’ revival

      February 2, 2023

      2023 SXSW Music Weekly Roundup

      February 2, 2023
    Please Visit My Website
    Home»Movies»Some books are impossible to turn into movies. Why let that stop you?
    Movies

    Some books are impossible to turn into movies. Why let that stop you?

    pleasevisitmywebsite_3kuhkbBy pleasevisitmywebsite_3kuhkbJanuary 3, 2023No Comments12 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp Email


    Comment

    That’s the phrase bandied about every time a novel makes it to the big screen. Then there’s its little cousin, the one so often uttered when an adaptation is announced: How are they gonna make XYZ into a movie?! That book’s totally unfilmable!

    Noah Baumbach’s “White Noise,” an adaptation of the 1985 Don DeLillo novel of the same name (nominally about a chemical spill that disrupts the life of a Hitler studies professor, but really it’s about fear of mortality, we think) is Hollywood’s latest attempt at adapting one of these “unfilmable books.” But what makes a book supposedly unfilmable varies. It could include a story that is far too complex, or a narrative that spends too much time in one character’s head. It could conjure a world that technology isn’t ready to represent on-screen. It could be too subtly written to translate to a visual medium. There are hundreds of reasons.

    So it’s not surprising that such a challenge delights some filmmakers, even if they’re not all successful (looking at you, 1967’s “Ulysses”). Sometimes, it takes multiple attempts. David Lynch, arguably one of our most visionary filmmakers, crashed with his disastrous 1984 “Dune,” so that Denis Villeneuve could soar with his 2021 adaptation that won six Oscars and was nominated for best picture.

    “I think it’s very hard to turn many books, if they’re really good books, into a good movie. You can turn them into any sort of TV show or movie, but you may be missing the point of what the original book was about,” Monty Python member turned film director Terry Gilliam says on a call from London. “Really good books are hard to translate into films, because it’s in the writing. And the writing is not about the surface. The writing is about the guts of the idea. And that’s always the problem. It’s about describing layers that are below the surface. The plot is part of the process, but it’s not the central quality of a good book.”

    “I’m very simple. I’m stupid, maybe,” Gilliam adds. “Because if a book captures me, I’ve already been victimized into wanting to do it. It’s about belief. And if I love the book and want to tell that story in cinematic terms, I’m off and running.”

    That’s exactly what happened when he adapted Hunter S. Thompson’s 1971 gonzo roman à clef “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas” into a 1998 movie the same name, a movie that Gilliam says “was very much about my time in America.”

    It was “a book I loved dearly,” he says. He had long wanted to adapt it, but the various scripts that floated by his desk were mostly “about two guys on a wild weekend in Las Vegas. That’s not what it’s about at all. It’s about the loss of the belief of the American Dream.” Finally, one popped up with Johnny Depp and Benicio Del Toro attached to the project. Thrilled with the prospects of working with them, he immediately took the job — and then got to work rewriting the script.

    The book presents a chaotic, drug-addled road-trip without much semblance of a traditional plot. Gilliam needed to find some foundation around which to build the film’s basic architecture and found it in a more structured piece of literature: Dante Alighieri’s narrative poem “The Divine Comedy.”

    In the poem, “Virgil takes Dante into the many layers of hell. Virgil is a Roman, Dante is a renaissance Catholic. So that’s how we began,” he says. Del Toro’s Dr. Gonzo is a pagan, while Depp’s Raoul Duke (a Thompson stand-in) has a more Christian background. “Once we thought of it that way, it became interesting. We are going into the various levels of hell.”

    He also didn’t shy away from voice-overs, something that “a lot of filmmakers think is cheating. Our attitude was that it’s essential to this story. It’s so much in the mind of Hunter Thompson’s character Duke, and the words are so brilliant that Hunter wrote, we wanted to incorporate that.” From there, it became a matter of deciding which scenes from the book to cut without watering down the theme, a far easier task with a structure in place.

    “In some ways it’s easier to turn bad books into good movies,” Gilliam says.

    Not everyone agrees with this, which is something of a Hollywood maxim. “People have said a bad book, or a pulp book, makes a great film, that it can be transcended into a great movie, whereas a great book can’t really translate into a great movie,” says Australian filmmaker John Hillcoat. “I actually don’t believe it.” He ticks off titles of from the list of classic films made from great books he put together after having this very debate with author and screenwriter Richard Price: “2001: A Space Odyssey,” “The Godfather,” “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest,” “The Last Picture Show” “A Clockwork Orange,” “The Long Goodbye,” “Psycho,” “The Maltese Falcon” … and so on and so forth.

    Which may help explain why he chose to tackle “The Road,” arguably one of Cormac McCarthy’s most personal and “unfilmable” books — ultimately creating a critically lauded and commercial successful movie in 2009. “What you have to do is capture the spirit of the book,” Hillcoat says. “You can never translate the poetry of the language.”

    In this case, while the book’s plot is about a father and son traveling through a post-apocalyptic United States, “the essence of the book is a love story between the father and the son.” The father carries a gun with two bullets, which serves a functional purpose: to take their lives should they be captured by cannibals. But it also shows the depth of the father’s love for his son. “This love story was the center of it, so we really focused on that.”

    The opportunity came about after McCarthy saw “The Proposition,” Hillcoat’s 2005 Western set in 1880s Australian outback, and became interested in him potentially adapting his upcoming post-apocalyptical novel.

    Hillcoat describes the experience as an exercise in “very judicious editing” because “the actual scenes themselves were so visceral and visually, beautifully described.” Perhaps more importantly, he understood that although it’s ultimately a story about hope, it’s not a happy tale. Hillcoat says it was a “huge battle” to keep the movie that way — perhaps the most vital aspect of its success — after the Weinstein brothers, who produced the movie, didn’t understand the ending.

    The most popular literary adaptations thus far in the 21st century, of course, aren’t from novels or short stories at all. Instead, they’re from a more static visual medium: comic books, which can run for decades, include vast numbers of characters and storylines and which don’t always need to follow linear narratives. As a result, they present their own series of complexities and challenges. Just ask Allan Heinberg, who helped adapt “Wonder Woman” and, most recently, a graphic novel he (along with many others) didn’t think could be adapted: Neil Gaiman’s “The Sandman.”

    “Having spent most of my adult life wanting to be the guy to adapt it, when the opportunity finally came, I went back and read it,” Heinberg says. “And the first thing I said was, ‘I don’t think we can do this. I don’t know how to do this. This would require so much change to the source material, I don’t think fans are going to get behind it.’”

    The book’s story is enormously complex, told over millions of years in various different realms and universes. To pack it all into a show would be literally impossible. To try to pack it all into a show would be a mess.

    So, Heinberg, Gaiman and David S. Goyer decided to transform “The Sandman” into “the dramatic story of one character,” named Dream, for the 2022 Netflix series they created. “That allowed us to narrow our focus, and it allowed us to look at the disparate piece of the comic book through that lens and incorporate everything we could, as long as it helped tell Dream’s story,” Heinberg says.

    Sometimes that meant, with Gaiman’s blessing, changing part of the narrative. Notably, the character of John Dee, a malicious supervillain in the comics, is presented here as empathic if ultimately misguided. “It was so much more interesting for all of us, and more emotional, that John’s mission was to save the world rather than destroy it,” Heinberg says, noting how important it was to have the series’ original author available to weigh in on such decisions.

    Though the logistics can be difficult, in some ways, adapting tough material might actually be easy. As Heinberg says, “successful adaptations are successful because the love the writer feels for the source material is successfully communicated.” Consider one of the more unusual contemporary adaptations: When “Parks and Recreation” and “The Good Place” showrunner and creator Michael Schur adapted (part of) David Foster Wallace’s modern epic “Infinite Jest” as a music video for the Decemberists’ “Calamity Song” in 2011.

    Colin Meloy, the band’s frontman, had been reading “Infinite Jest” while working on the band’s 2011 album “The King is Dead.” He was particularly struck by a chapter in which the students at the fictional Enfield Tennis Academy play Eschaton, a fictional geopolitical game dreamed up by the author that simulates global thermonuclear warfare and is played across four tennis courts with, well, tennis balls and rackets. The game is absurdly complex (the intermediate value theorem comes up at one point in its description), but the scene is also side-splittingly funny.

    “It’s so great. After you’ve been reading this very cerebral slog for a while, to suddenly get this kind of breezy, super funny, super smart chapter, it’s really kind of breathtaking,” says Meloy. “And I thought, ‘That should be the music video for “Calamity Song.”’ But when they pitched the idea, they received “radio silence.”

    “Finally my manager had to say to me, ‘Nobody is going to make that. You’ll never find a director who gets it enough to pull it off,’” he adds.

    Enter Schur, who had purchased “Infinite Jest” the day it came out in 1996 as a Harvard junior, and — after petitioning the English department to allow him to focus on such a recent novel — made it the subject of his thesis along with Thomas Pynchon’s “V.” While working on his beloved sitcoms, Schur had also acquired the rights to film the book — and even written a few episodes for a potential HBO series based on it.

    When he eventually got the call asking if he was interested, Schur says, he responded, “You’re asking me if I’m interested in directing a music video of the new single of one of my favorite bands based on my favorite novel?”

    Schur was particularly excited to shoot this part of the novel since Eschaton “is the most cinematic sequence of the book, the part everyone remembers the most. The only thing I worried about is I had to get this right.”

    So he asked the “Parks and Recreation” production team to help, noting that there wasn’t much money involved. They were game and they headed to Portland to shoot the video — spending the entire budget on permits for tennis courts and costumes. The result was a nearly perfect visual rendition of the passage. “Everywhere we could, we put what amounted to an Easter egg into the visuals,” Schur says.

    He still hopes to one day turn the book into something. HBO was willing to pay him to write three episodes of the show, he says, but Wallace’s widow Karen Green didn’t feel comfortable with her late husband’s revered book being adapted — so Schur walked away from the project.

    Though he hopes she someday changes her mind, adapting it presents challenges that don’t accompany all books, even many of the “unfilmable” ones. Dealing with the complex narrative would simply be a writing and filmmaking problem, albeit not an easy one to solve. Translating DFW’s unique omniscient narrator’s voice — simultaneously colloquial and academic, which Schur describes as “writing in the way we think and talk” — presents a tougher challenge but it’s probably not undoable.

    No, the biggest challenge is one that comes up with many canonical books, particularly science fiction, that — at the time of publication — looked to a future that, by now, has actually arrived. “It’s futurist. It came out in ’96, but he was roughly looking at the years 2000 to 2008 or so, or 2002 to 2010, depending on different theories. And he was predicting a lot of stuff about the future, like video chatting, basically FaceTime and Zoom. He was predicting the merging of computer and television, which happened,” Schur says. “So part of the unfilmability of that book, if you want to call it that, is that to make it now you would have to project forward five to 15 years in the same way he was doing when he wrote it and invent new things that are as good and interesting as the things he predicted, which is not easy to do.”

    Can anything be adapted for the screen? Probably. Should anything be filmed? That’s a debate that’s long raged in Hollywood. Though many adaptations turn out wonderfully, “There’s a reason there are different ways of telling stories: writing songs, writing books, making films, making video games,” Meloy says. “I don’t think that a bug. I think it’s a feature of storytelling that each of these different modes have things that can’t be replicated anywhere else.”



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleNew Orleans Fan Expo Brings The Mandrorian, Stranger Things.Entertainment/life
    Next Article Google Reveals Amber Heard Position as Most Googled Celebrity in 2022 – Proving It’s Johnny Depp
    pleasevisitmywebsite_3kuhkb
    • Website

    Related Posts

    10 movies that make you feel sorry for the villains

    February 2, 2023

    The world needs movies like ’80 For Brady’

    February 2, 2023

    True Lies Trailer Reveals Tom Arnold and New Release Date

    February 2, 2023

    These two adventures should be played in preparation for the D&D movie

    February 2, 2023

    17 Black History Month movies to watch with your kids

    February 2, 2023

    NFL great Tom owns Jane Fonda & Company.

    February 2, 2023
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Our Picks

    Bridging the Gender Gap: Inspiring Words from the Women Making Waves on Starship | Annie Handrick | | Starship Technologies | March 2023

    March 8, 2023

    AI apps like ChatGPT may finally kill the cover letter

    March 8, 2023

    Snow Crash author Neal Stephenson on the metaverse, making movies, climate fears

    March 6, 2023

    A new era of tech coverage at Vox

    March 6, 2023
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    News

    Bridging the Gender Gap: Inspiring Words from the Women Making Waves on Starship | Annie Handrick | | Starship Technologies | March 2023

    By pleasevisitmywebsite_3kuhkbMarch 8, 2023

    Author: Lys VerthalIn honor of International Women’s Day today, we’ve compiled a list of powerful…

    AI apps like ChatGPT may finally kill the cover letter

    March 8, 2023

    Snow Crash author Neal Stephenson on the metaverse, making movies, climate fears

    March 6, 2023

    A new era of tech coverage at Vox

    March 6, 2023
    About Us

    This website provides information about Entertainment and other things. Keep Supporting Us With the Latest News and we Will Provide the Best Of Our To Makes You Updated All Around The World News. Keep Sporting US.

    Our Picks

    Watching Wonder Woman 1984 with an HBO Max Free Trial?

    January 13, 2021

    Wonder Woman Vs. Supergirl: Who Would Win

    January 13, 2021

    PS Offering 10 More Games for Free, Including Horizon Zero

    January 13, 2021

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Contact us
    • DMCA
    • Privacy Policy
    © 2023 pleasevisitmywebsite. Designed by pleasevisitmywebsite.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.